Fast forward six hundred years or so, and set your compass for NW, a quadrant of London created by the postal system. There are a few "posh" or middle-class neighborhoods there -- Hampstead and its heath, College Park, and St. John's Wood (pronounced "sinjuns wood"), the last of which was home to a record high price paid for a private home. But large areas of the district are working class and poor, their inhabitants dwelling in council flats (what we'd call public housing) in places with names like West Hendon, Cricklewood, Wood Green, Tottenham, and Colindale (the latter once home to the British Library's newspaper room, before it went digital and was closed down). There's no Mary Poppins here, no Jane and Michael Banks -- but there are plenty of Leroys, Kevins, and Olivers -- and, in Zadie Smith's world, Leahs, Keishas, Felixes and Nathans.
Theirs is a world of unpredictable outcomes and mixed verdicts, of ambitions simmering in a pot from which there's no easy escape. Some are "cleaning up" their lives, though sometimes it turns out that it doesn't matter; others have "arrived" at higher class status, but still lead lives doubled by subterfuge. Cultural identities are jumbled in the heap, and while coming from a Jamaican or Pakistani family doesn't prevent some from climbing the class ladder, it also doesn't guarantee any kind of group solidarity -- it's every man and woman for themselves.
The structure of the novel mirrors this jumble, with short epiphanies and snippets of chatter sprinkled among longer, more narrative passages. Some sections take one down the proverbial stream of consciousness, while others are almost entirely dialogue. Typographically, that dialogue is handled rather differently here: we don't have traditional lines of speech with quote marks, but rather a smaller typeface, inset from the main text, as though we were momentarily donning another lens. The effect can be mesmerizing, but also confusing. You also may find yourself puzzling over a word -- of course, you can always Google it -- but you may also find the slang dictionary at peevish.co.uk to be of some use. Oh, and a map of course! -- this one is scalable, though this one's more fun; another will show you how to get about by bus. There's even a map of poverty itself, which will show how intermixed and variegated it is.

I thought that the interaction that Leah has with Shar on pages 60/61 was particularly interesting. So far, Leah has been good-natured towards Shar, then accusatory, then felt hurt by her. Leah seemed to push aside the knowledge that she would never get the 30 pounds back from Shar when she gave it to her, but others made her feel bad about it, particularly her mother. Michel is also disappointed, and is willing to (try) to corner Shar in a store to get her to pay them back.
ReplyDeleteWhen Leah sees Shar again, she tries to take everything in so that she can be more like Michel, even calling out to Shar about a month later to call her a thief.
Finally, though (to where I've read to as of this post!), Shar speaks back. She looks even worse than she did the day that she came into Leah's house. Leah has taken an (accidently) violent approach towards her, and Shar is sick of being called to. She basically scares Leah into leaving her alone. Even at this point, instead of standing her ground, Leah offers to connect Shar to non-profits or other organizations that can offer her help. This, for me, is a continuation of Leah's characterization that started the first time that she met Shar. Leah does not have it in her to report the woman, to seriously corner her, or to otherwise force the money out of her. I personally don't think that Leah ever expected it back or, honestly, even really cares about getting it back. She seems like someone who honestly feels bad about the situation that Shar is in.
This is also shown when she gets off the train with her mother to go shopping. She and her mother see someone that they knew many years ago that seems to have fallen down a dark, unfortunate path. Her mother immediately feels bad for his mother while Leah seems to question more about how Nathan got there. Even when they are on the train and her mother is making racist remarks about "those people" versus "us," Leah feels the need to apologize to the people sitting around them by disagreeing with her mother. I think that these moments not only show the ways of life in the NW part of London, but are also great characterizing moments for Leah.
Within the 4 main characters of this stories lies a message between them. The 4 characters all come from a different outcome but most importantly a different economic background. Trying to survive and rise within the economy while maintaining a relationship with each other is becoming difficult. They're less things they are beginning to have in common.
ReplyDeleteMoney has always seemed to be a problem from the very beginning of time.
NW is actually a novel that I have read prior to this class, which I think was amazing. At first when I read it, it was hard to keep up with 4 different main characters. But I read it over and over again, and then the different stories made sense. It is great to see how different lives living in London may look like, especially considering their lives are all drastically different. A story that particularly struck me was Natalie's story. Natalie has various struggles with her race, and was the daughter of immigrants from Jamaica. Natalie does not let anything define her, in opposition to that she works hard to beat the usual norms in her community. It is sad that Natalie has to do so many things to fit in such as change her name, and is confused about her identity in various parts of her life.
ReplyDeleteI find Zadie Smith’s use of a quote from the Peasants’ Revolt an interesting starting point. It sets the reader up to look for the themes about the relationship between different socio-economic classes throughout the novel. The reader sees this relationship through Leah and Natalie, two childhood best friends who started out in the same working-class community. Natalie followed her ambition and left Leah behind in order to be a part of a higher socio-economic class. Not only is there an external conflict between the old friends about their new differences, but Natalie has a hard time internally with her own identity. Just as John Ball says about Adam and Eve, Leah and Natalie were equals too.
ReplyDelete- Spock Nardone
ReplyDeleteNW by Zadie Smith shows how different lives may look while living in London. The four characters are all navigating their worlds within certain socioeconomic backgrounds while trying to remain friends, but struggle because they are beginning to have less in common with each other. It really shows the reality of monetary struggles, and how it can create conflict between family and friends. The racism shows another level of struggle, particularly for Natalie, and how that also plays into the dynamic of their friendships and experience growing up in London at this time.
- Jess Panichas